!!Frank Geels - Selected Publications
\\
Geels, F.W., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J., Southerton, D., 2015, A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions, Global Environmental Change, 34, 1-12 \\
\\
Penna, C.C.R. and Geels, F.W., 2015, ‘Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979-2011): An application and extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model’, Research Policy, 44(5), 1029-1048 \\
\\
Geels, F.W. and Penna, C.C.R., 2015, ‘Societal problems and industry reorientation: Elaborating the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model and a case study of car safety in the USA (1900-1995)’, Research Policy, 44(1), 67-82 \\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2014, ‘Regime resistance against low-carbon energy transitions: Introducing politics and power in the multi-level perspective’, Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21-40\\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2014 ‘Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework’, Research Policy, 43(2), 261-277 \\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2013, ‘The impact of the financial-economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 67-95\\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2013, System innovation: Concepts, Dynamics and Governance, Report for the OECD, Innovation and Technology Policy unit, Paris, OECD.\\
\\
Geels, F.W., Kemp, R., Dudley, G. and Lyons, G. (eds.), 2012, Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport, New York: Routledge \\
\\
Turnheim, B. and Geels, F.W., 2012, ‘Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913-1997)’, Energy Policy, 50, 35-49 \\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2012, ‘A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies’, Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471-482\\
\\
Penna, C.C.R. and Geels, F.W., 2012, ‘Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 999-1020 \\
\\
Geels, F.W. and Verhees, B., 2011, ‘Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945-1986)’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(6), 910-930\\
\\
Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Leeuwis, C., and Van Mierlo, B., 2011, 'Normative contestation in transitions ‘in the making’: Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry (1970-2008)', Research Policy, 40(2), 263-275 \\
\\
Geels, F.W., Hekkert, M. and Jacobsson, S. (eds.), 2011, The Dynamics of Sustainable Innovation Journeys, Routledge \\
\\
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Geels, F.W. and Loorbach, D., 2010, Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, New York: Routledge \\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2010, ‘Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective’, Research Policy, 39(4), 495-510\\
\\
Schot, J.W. and Geels, F.W., 2008, 'Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda and policy', Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537-554\\
\\
Verbong, G.P.J. and Geels, F.W., 2007, ‘The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004)’, Energy Policy, 35(2), 1025-1037\\
\\
Geels, F.W. and Schot, J.W., 2007, ‘Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways', Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417\\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2004, ‘From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory’, Research Policy, 33(6/7), 897-920\\
\\
Geels, F.W., 2002, ‘Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study’, Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257-1274